What is the test for holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of jury misconduct?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sopher, D059363 (Cal. App. 2013):

The trial court has the discretion to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of jury misconduct, and to permit the parties to call jurors to testify at such a hearing. (People v. Hedgecock (1990) 51 Cal.3d 395, 419.) Defendant is not, however, entitled to an evidentiary hearing as a matter of right. Such a

Page 7

hearing should be held only when the court concludes an evidentiary hearing is "necessary to resolve material, disputed issues of fact." (Id. at p. 415.) " 'The hearing should not be used as a "fishing expedition" to search for possible misconduct, but should be held only when the defense has come forward with evidence demonstrating a strong possibility that prejudicial misconduct has occurred. Even upon such a showing, an evidentiary hearing will generally be unnecessary unless the parties' evidence presents a material conflict that can only be resolved at such a hearing.' " (People v. Avila (2006) 38 Cal.4th 491, 604.)

Other Questions


Is it within the jurisdiction of a trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of jury misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of jury misconduct on the grounds that two jurors discussed their personal experiences with drugs and the future of the death penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of jury misconduct? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury be called to testify at an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth or falsity of allegations of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Can a court hold an evidentiary hearing when jury misconduct is alleged in a new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a court's decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing when a defendant alleges jury misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for holding an evidentiary hearing when jury misconduct is alleged in a new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing into allegations of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its position in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defense allegations of jury misconduct or in failing to compel jurors to testify? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be compelled to testify at a post-verdict evidentiary hearing regarding allegations of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.