What is the test for evidence to support a claim that someone has committed a crime against someone else?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Frasco, E070910 (Cal. App. 2020):
be relevant and authenticated. ([Evid. Code,] 350, 1401.) The proffered evidence must be an original writing or otherwise admissible secondary evidence of the writing's content. ([Evid. Code,] 1520, 1521.)" (People v. Goldsmith (2014) 59 Cal.4th 258, 266.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support appellant's claim that insufficient evidence supports his claim that he was convicted of failing to follow an instruction? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
