What is the test for establishing that identification evidence is "reasonable, credible and solid value"?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, B226006 (Cal. App. 2011):
We note that defendant misstates the law by arguing that "identifications must be supported by evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid value." Identification evidence is assessed in the same manner as other evidence under the substantial evidence standard. (People v. Cuevas (1995) 12 Cal.4th 252, 277.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that supporting evidence is reasonable, inherently credible and solid value? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a 'reasonable, credible and solid value' in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing credible and solid value of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing credible and solid value of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that statements by a victim about the value of a stolen property constitute "prima facie evidence of value for purposes of restitution"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding identification evidence in a motion to exclude identification evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When a conviction for sexual assault is based primarily on circumstantial evidence, does the court have to presume every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
