What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff must offer a plausible explanation for inconsistent statements?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mohammed v. Garland, 18-2862-ag (2nd Cir. 2021):
than offer a plausible explanation for his inconsistent statements to secure relief; he must demonstrate that a reasonable fact-finder would be compelled to credit his testimony." (internal quotation marks omitted)); Foster v. INS, 376 F.3d 75, 78 (2d Cir. 2004) ("[W]e require petitioner to raise issues to the BIA in order to preserve them for judicial review." (internal quotation marks, alterations, and emphasis omitted)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a plaintiff makes a statement at a police station that was subsequently suppressed as a result of her statements made in the car, what are the consequences of the suppression of the second statement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff has met their burden of establishing that their injury is personal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a witness has inconsistent statements? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a witness has inconsistent statements? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff required to provide an explanation as to why a statement or omission was false or misleading? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is clear established Federal law governing the meaning of the word "clearly established federal law"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to respond to a Defendant's statement stating that the material facts contained in that statement are to be admitted as a matter of law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff has a valid claim to be a plaintiff in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff entitled to the same safeguards as a plaintiff on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to establish jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
