What is the test for establishing that a party to a statement of intent, purpose, or knowledge can destroy the privileged status of that statement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Abraham v. Lancaster Community Hospital, 217 Cal.App.3d 796, 266 Cal.Rptr. 360 (Cal. App. 1990):
e) Sixth Appellate District: Financial Corp. of America v. Wilburn, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d at page 777, 234 Cal.Rptr. 653 ["Plaintiffs' premise is that the subjective intent, purpose, or knowledge of a writer can destroy the privileged status of otherwise privileged statements. The law is otherwise."].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a party who makes a statement in the presence of a witness admissible for the purpose of showing the party's reaction to the statement? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence of gang activity have to be considered for the purpose of determining whether an individual acted with intent, purpose and knowledge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment when an overnight guest is found to have been a party to a party in the home of the party's landlord? (California, United States of America)
Does attorney-client privilege extend to statements of intent to commit future crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a party is not a party to a lawsuit? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1101, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code allow for the introduction of an uncharged act for the purpose of establishing intent and motive? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the purpose of establishing that a person who is not a party to a motion is entitled to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there was a conspiracy between a party and a party? (California, United States of America)
Does a party's out-of-court statement qualify under the party admissions exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
