What is the test for establishing that a boundary line is binding on the successors of the original parties?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kofl v. Dunn, 1 Cal.Rptr. 278, 176 Cal.App.2d 204 (Cal. App. 1959):
In Needham v. Collamer, 94 Cal.App.2d 609, at page 612, 211 P.2d 308, 309, it was stated that the boundary 'line so agreed upon attaches to the deeds of the original parties and is binding on them and their successors by subsequent deeds.'
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a cross-complaint be filed against a party who is not a party to the original action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a party has received a letter or telegram claiming to be from a different party? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment when an overnight guest is found to have been a party to a party in the home of the party's landlord? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing that a party defending against a motion of no confidence has the burden to establish that the motion is a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion where the opposing party has failed to establish that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a party is not a party to a lawsuit? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there was a conspiracy between a party and a party? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion where the opposing party failed to establish that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established? (California, United States of America)
Does a party's failure to file a declaration in a personal injury action relieve the moving party of the burden of establishing the evidentiary facts of every element necessary to entitle him to judgment? (California, United States of America)
