California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Baltezor, F077646 (Cal. App. 2021):
"The purpose of the corpus delicti rule is to assure that 'the accused is not admitting to a crime that never occurred.' [Citation.] The amount of independent proof of a crime required for this purpose is quite small; we have described this quantum of evidence as 'slight' [citation] 'minimal' [citation]. The People need make only a prima facie showing ' "permitting the reasonable inference that a crime was committed." ' [Citations.] The inference need not be 'the only, or even the most compelling, one ... [but
Page 10
need only be] a reasonable one ....' " (People v. Jones (1998) 17 Cal.4th 279, 301-302 (Jones).)
At least one court has held "separate evidence is not required as to each individual count to establish the corpus delicti; rather, evidence that multiple molestations took place will establish the corpus delicti for multiple counts." (People v. Tompkins (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1260 (Tompkins).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.