The following excerpt is from United States v. Okatan, (2nd Cir. 2013):
but accept [the] district court's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous." United States v. Desena, 287 F.3d 170, 176 (2d Cir. 2002). In order to establish a constitutional violation based on the deportation of a witness, the defendant "must at least make some plausible showing of how [the witness's] testimony would have been both material and favorable to his defense." United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858, 867 (1982).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.