The following excerpt is from Zerman v. Ball, 735 F.2d 15 (2nd Cir. 1984):
In sum, even construing this pro se complaint liberally, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), we conclude that insofar as the complaint was based on items (a) and (c)-(h), it was properly dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).
Page 22
2. The representation that the market was up
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.