The following excerpt is from Clark v. City of Portland, 86 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 1996):
We review a district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo. Sands v. Lewis, 886 F.2d 1166, 1168 (9th Cir.1989). Unless it is absolutely clear that no amendment can cure the defect, a pro se litigant must be given leave to amend the complaint before dismissal. Id. In civil rights actions where the plaintiff appears pro se, the court must construe pleadings liberally and afford the plaintiff the benefit of any doubt. Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Dep't, 839 F.2d 621, 623 (9th Cir.1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.