British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kauwell v. Melnyk, 2007 BCSC 485 (CanLII):
In Peter v. Beblow, supra at 1012, Cory J., writing the minority concurring opinion, states: There is ample support for the proposition that once enrichment has been found, the conclusion that the plaintiff has suffered a corresponding deprivation is virtually automatic.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.