California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Twiggs v. Superior Court, 194 Cal.Rptr. 152, 34 Cal.3d 360, 667 P.2d 1165 (Cal. 1983):
The court reached this conclusion despite the lack of evidence that the prosecution acted maliciously or in bad faith in seeking the felony charges. The court emphasized that actual retaliatory motivation need not be shown. Rather, due process dictates that a defendant may not be deterred from exercising his constitutional right to attack his conviction by the possibility of prosecutorial retaliation. (Blackledge v. Perry, supra, 417 U.S. at p. 28, 94 S.Ct. at p. 2102.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.