What is the test for determining whether the People have shown a legitimate justification for the prolonged delay in bringing criminal charges against the Defendant?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hartman, 170 Cal.App.3d 572, 216 Cal.Rptr. 641 (Cal. App. 1985):

Next, in determining whether the People have shown a legitimate justification for the prolonged delay, "the particular circumstances surrounding the decision not to prosecute, the length of the delay, and the reasons for the subsequent re-evaluation and prosecution must all be considered." (Penney v. Superior Court, supra, 28 Cal.App.3d at p. 954, 105 Cal.Rptr. 162.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the use of the STEP Act to determine whether a defendant who fired a gun repeatedly at a group of people was a member of a criminal gang, who then committed the crime for the benefit of the criminal gang? (California, United States of America)
What are the factors that determine whether a defendant should face separate criminal charges in separate criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a motion for habeas corpus against the District Attorney for allegedly delaying charging and bringing him before a magistrate for a charge of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the use of the STEP Act to determine whether a defendant who fired a gun repeatedly at a group of people was a member of a criminal gang, who then committed the crime for the benefit of the criminal gang? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Section 654 of the Criminal Code when determining whether an assault charge should be stayed due to the People's election? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
What authority does a defendant have to make an election to determine whether a defendant should be charged with making terrorist threats? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is charged with a charge of membership of a criminal gang commit one or more of the "two or more" predicate offenses necessary to establish a pattern of criminal gang activity? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state and federal constitutional test for determining whether a delay in bringing charges was justified? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.