What is the test for determining whether provocation or heat of passion is sufficient to reduce the class of the offense from murder to manslaughter?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Noonkester, C086125 (Cal. App. 2019):
"[T]he ' "existence of provocation which is not 'adequate' to reduce the class of the offense [from murder to manslaughter] may nevertheless raise a reasonable doubt that the defendant formed the intent to kill upon, and carried it out after, deliberation and premeditation" ' -- an inquiry relevant to determining whether the offense is premeditated murder in the first degree, or unpremeditated murder in the second degree. [Citations.]" (People v. Carasi (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1263, 1306.) "The test of whether provocation or heat of passion can negate malice so as to mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter is
Page 10
objective. [Citations.] . . . The test of whether provocation or heat of passion can negate deliberation and premeditation so as to reduce first degree murder to second degree murder, on the other hand, is subjective. [Citations.]" (People v. Padilla (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 675, 678.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
