The following excerpt is from Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York, Local 1974 of I.B.P.A.T., AFL-CIO v. Local 530 of Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons Intern. Ass'n, 954 F.2d 69 (2nd Cir. 1978):
This contention seriously misapprehends the basis of the district court's jurisdiction, which was premised upon 29 U.S.C. 185(a) (1988). Section 185(a) explicitly vests district courts with jurisdiction over "[s]uits for violation of contracts between ... labor organization[s] representing employees in an industry affecting commerce." See Wooddell v. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 71, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S.Ct. 494, 496, 116 L.Ed.2d 419 (1991). The district court's subject matter jurisdiction rested squarely on that statutory foundation. It was not limited by the court's discretionary determinations initially to defer to the established administrative mechanisms, and subsequently to act in lieu of them on a case-by-case basis.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.