What is the test for determining vicarious liability of an employer in a workers' compensation case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Wank v. Richman & Garrett, 165 Cal.App.3d 1103, 211 Cal.Rptr. 919 (Cal. App. 1985):
"Thus while workers' compensation cases can be helpful in determining vicarious liability of the employer for torts of the employee, such cases are not controlling." (Church v. Arko (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 291, 298-300, 142 Cal.Rptr. 92; fn. omitted.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a plaintiff in a workers' compensation case claim vicarious liability of an employer for torts of the employee? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2750.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act grant immunity from liability in a personal injury action at law even if the employer's insurer is not responsible for payment of workers' compensation benefits to the injured employee? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Workers' Compensation Board have exclusive jurisdiction over a claim that the independent adjuster of a self-insured employer has delayed or failed to pay a workers' compensation award? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Workers Compensation Board have the authority to determine and allow a lien against a Workers Compensation award for living expenses? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the liability of an employer under section 4663 of the Rehabilitation and Accident Compensation Act for an employee's permanent disability as a result of an industrial injury? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of vicarious liability apply to domestic workers employed by a homeowner? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether work relief is "employment" for purposes of workers' compensation? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer liable for payment of workers' compensation to an employee when the employee sustains an injury arising out of and in the course of the employment? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a homeowner who hires an unlicensed employee as an employee under section 2750.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. workers' compensation and general liability) is liable to the homeowner? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining who is the employer in a workmen's compensation case? (California, United States of America)
