What is the test for determining prejudicial error in a trial court's instruction on an element of an offence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Crews, A144227 (Cal. App. 2016):

" 'In deciding whether a trial court's misinstruction on an element of an offense is prejudicial to the defendant, we ask whether it appears " ' "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained." ' " ' " (People v. Wilkins (2013) 56 Cal.4th 333, 350.) To assist this general inquiry, a number of analytical approaches have been developed.

Page 6

Other Questions


Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to argue that a trial court commits prejudicial error by instructing in the language of CALJIC No.51 that motive is not an element of the crime charged? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's error in instructing a jury to consider all the elements of a criminal offence reversible per se? (California, United States of America)
What is the harmless error analysis that a reviewing court should use when a trial court's jury instructions incorrectly define an element of a charged offense? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court's error contributed to a jury's error? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an instructional error during a trial affected the outcome of the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have any prejudicial error in instructing a jury to convict a defendant of burglary by mistake? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.