What is the test for corroborating evidence in a sexual assault case?

Corroborating evidence is sufficient if it tends to connect the defendant with the commission of a crime in such a way so as to reasonably satisfy the jury that the complaining witness is telling the truth; the corroboration is inadequate if it requires aid from the testimony of the witness to be corroborated in order to connect the defendant with the alleged offense. ⁷ (People v. MacEwing, Supra, 45 Cal.2d 218, 225, 288 P.2d 257; People v. Frankfort, Supra, 114 Cal.App.2d 680, 692, 251 P.2d 401.) Defendants claim that the corroborating evidence produced at trial fell short of the statutory standard. We disagree.