What is the test for changing the meaning of a section of the New York State Criminal Code to its plain meaning?

Because the statute is clear on its face, we would not alter the plain meaning based on the legislative history, unless the plain language produced an absurd result or a conflict with some other statute (see People v. Roberts, 31 N.Y.3d 406, 418, 79 N.Y.S.3d 597, 104 N.E.3d 701 [2018] [internal citations and quotation marks omitted] ["If the words chosen have a definite meaning, which involves no absurdity or contradiction, then there is no room for construction and courts have no right to add or take away from that meaning"] ). In any event, the legislative history does not support the majority's interpretation of the statute.