The following excerpt is from Mirzakhanian v. Chater, 113 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir. 1997):
The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, and we will not restate them here. We review a district court's order upholding the Commissioner's denial of benefits de novo. Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1279 (9th Cir.1996). We will affirm the Commissioner's decision if substantial evidence supports that decision and the Commissioner applied the correct legal standards. Id. After thorough consideration of the record and the briefs, we affirm.
Reports of Treating Physicians
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.