The following excerpt is from Ward v. Oromde, No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. 2011):
When an inmate challenges the conditions of his confinement, the court must analyze each condition separate to determine whether, objectively, that specific condition violates the Eighth Amendment. See Toussaint, 801 F.2d at 1107. It is possible that some conditions of confinement may constitute a violation in combination when each would not do so alone. See Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 304 (1991). The court must also consider the amount
Page 10
of time the inmate was subjected to the condition. See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978). Subjectively, the inmate must establish that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to an unconstitutional condition of confinement. See Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.