Should an equal division of family property and family debt be significantly unfair as of the date of separation, the court may order an unequal division of family property or family debt, or both (s. 95). In Remmem v. Remmem, 2014 BCSC 1552, the court stated that the unfairness must be compelling or meaningful having regard to the factors set out in s. 95(2). The court need not exact “perfect fairness”, but only when equal division would be unjust or unreasonable should a judge depart from equal division: L.G. v. R.G., 2013 BCSC 983.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.