What is the test for an anti-SLAPP analysis based on the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rickley v. Tesoro Ref. & Mktg. Co., B291375 (Cal. App. 2020):
to "the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based"]; see, e.g., Karnazes v. Ares (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 344, 353-354 [considering pleadings, a declaration, and emails attached thereto at first step of anti-SLAPP analysis].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How do we obtain background facts from the pleadings and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based? (California, United States of America)
Does a search warrant affidavit that supports the veracity of an affidavit need to be examined in order to support a third party culpability defense? (California, United States of America)
Does an unverified pleading constitute an affidavit competent to prove the facts stated therein? (California, United States of America)
Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the law on "accident-based" liability in general liability claims? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the mental state defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the art of the state-of-the-art defense in the failure to warn? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to an objection at trial when the prosecution fails to disclose to the defense the facts supporting the objection? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal or state law error for failing to instruct on a requested affirmative defense instruction supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant who challenges a search warrant based on an affidavit containing omissions from an interview with Seihoon have to prove that they omitted something from the affidavit? (California, United States of America)
