The following excerpt is from Dayton v. City of Fairfield, No. 2:17-cv-01898-KJM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. 2018):
Second, even assuming defendants' actions in removing these items infringed upon a property interest, the first amended complaint nonetheless fails to state a claim. When a property interest is invoked, due process requires that the property owner "be given notice and an 'opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.'" Schneider v. Cty. of San Diego, 28 F.3d 89, 92 (9th Cir. 1994), as amended on denial of reh'g and reh'g en banc (Oct. 11, 1994) (internal citations omitted.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.