The following excerpt is from Xiao Xing Ni v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 260 (2nd Cir. 2007):
F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). Our review of an adverse credibility determination is "exceedingly narrow," Melgar de Torres v. Reno, 191 F.3d 307, 313 (2d Cir.1999), and ensures only that it is "based upon neither a misstatement of the facts in the record nor bald speculation or caprice." Zhang, 386 F.3d at 74.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.