California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Masters, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 85, 365 P.3d 861, 62 Cal.4th 1019 (Cal. 2016):
words but the circumstances under which they were uttered, the possible motivation of the declarant, and the declarant's relationship to the defendant.' [Citation.] ... [] A trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence is a matter committed to its discretion' "and will not be disturbed except on a showing the trial court exercised its discretion in an arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice." ' [Citation.]" (People v. Geier (2007) 41 Cal.4th 555, 584585, 61 Cal.Rptr.3d 580, 161 P.3d 104 ; see People v. McCurdy (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1063, 11081109, 176 Cal.Rptr.3d 103, 331 P.3d 265 (McCurdy ).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.