The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Pillion, 967 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1992):
Information gained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be admitted as direct evidence. Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 223 (1960); United States v. Ant, 882 F.2d 1389, 1393 (9th Cir.1989). Such evidence, however, is admissible for impeachment. United States v. Havens, 446 U.S. 620, 627-28 (1980) ("[A] defendant's statements ... are subject to ... impeachment by the government, albeit by evidence that has been illegally obtained....").
The district court is AFFIRMED.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.