What is the test for admitting expert testimony for abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. PORTER, F057076, No. 1219173 (Cal. App. 2011):
We review the trial court's admission of expert testimony for abuse of discretion. (People v. Prince (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1179, 1222.) We may find error only if the witness "'clearly lacks qualification as an expert.'" (People v. Hogan (1982) 31 Cal.3d 815, 852, disapproved on other grounds in People v. Cooper (1991) 53 Cal.3d 771, 836.)
Page 93
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of admitting expert testimony for abuse of abuse? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony under abuse of the abuse standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a court's decision to admit expert testimony for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a challenge to the admission of expert testimony for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is expert testimony subject to review for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of the abuse of evidence in a criminal case where a defendant admitted to a prior burglary? (California, United States of America)
