The following excerpt is from MacDermid Printing Solutions LLC v. Cortron Corp., 833 F.3d 172 (2nd Cir. 2016):
72 Marshall v. Randall , 719 F.3d 113, 116 (2d Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). As we have often observed, abuse of discretion is a term of art that merely signifies that a district court based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence, or rendered a decision that cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions. Barrella , 814 F.3d at 611 (internal quotation marks omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.