California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Justus v. Atchison, 126 Cal.Rptr. 150, 53 Cal.App.3d 556 (Cal. App. 1975):
Whether life before birth be considered existent or merely potential (Roe v. Wade, supra, 410 U.S. at 150, 159-160, 163, 93 S.Ct. at 725, 729-730, 731, 35 L.Ed.2d at 175, 181, 183), 3 it serves no rational purpose to make live birth of the decedent the sine qua non for an action for the wrongful death of a child. As I have already pointed out, the pecuniary loss to the parents is essentially the same whether the deceased child be a fully developed stillborn child or a newborn child. Constitutional equal protection of law therefore demands that the law treat these similarly situated parents the same.
* Before Cobey, Acting P.J., Allport and Potter, JJ.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.