California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Superior Court (Chico etc. Health Center), 187 Cal.App.3d 648, 232 Cal.Rptr. 165 (Cal. App. 1986):
Preliminarily, we note that the legality of the search is not ripe for review, since the superior court has not ruled on the issue. The only question before [187 Cal.App.3d 652] us is whether the superior court erred in declining to consider the merits of the People's petition. While we recognize that we have no authority to order the superior court to exercise its discretion in a particular way, when, as here, that court has erroneously refused to exercise its discretion at all, we may direct it to do so. (Burnett v. Superior Court (1974) 12 Cal.3d 865, 869-870, 117 Cal.Rptr. 556, 528 P.2d 372.) For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the superior court erred in denying the People writ review of the magistrate's order. Accordingly, we shall issue a writ of mandate directing the superior court to reinstate the People's petition and rule on the merits of the controversy.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.