California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Street, B267285 (Cal. App. 2017):
them. [Citations.] We review the trial court's determination in the light most favorable to the respondent and presume the existence of every fact the trial court could reasonably deduce from the evidence." (People v. Jones (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1139, 1143.)
By imposing and not staying sentence for burglary, the trial court implicitly found Street had separate intents and objectives in committing the burglary and the murder. (People v. Islas (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 116, 129.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.