What is the test for a probation condition that prohibits the possession of "intoxicants" without the supervision of a physician?

In People v. Rodriguez (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 578, the defendant challenged as unconstitutionally vague and overbroad a probation condition that she " '[n]ot use or possess alcohol, intoxicants, narcotics, or other controlled substances without the prescription of a physician . . . .' " (Id. at p. 592.) This court concluded that "a scienter element is reasonably implicit in this condition" with respect to controlled substances. (Id. at p. 593.) However, this court also recognized that the probation condition was not limited to substances regulated by statute. (Id. at p. 594) Noting that " 'intoxicants' . . . is susceptible of different interpretations, which may include common items such as adhesives, bath salts, mouthwash, and over-the-counter medicines," this court concluded

Page 7