California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Andrew M. (In re Andrew M.), G050102 (Cal. App. 2015):
A probation condition that limits constitutional rights will be deemed "constitutionally overbroad when it substantially limits a person's rights and those limitations are not closely tailored to the purpose of the condition." (People v. Harrisson (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 637, 641.) To withstand a vagueness challenge, a probation condition "'must be sufficiently precise for the probationer to know what is required of
Page 5
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.