The following excerpt is from Bray v. County of San Diego, 19 F.3d 26 (9th Cir. 1994):
Our decision is consistent with Curnow v. Ridgecrest Police, 952 F.2d 321 (9th Cir.1991). In Curnow, we held that it was unreasonable for a police officer to shoot at a suspect who was reaching for, but not pointing, a semi-automatic rifle and who was not facing the police. If a reasonable officer should not have used deadly force in Curnow, where there was a firearm in plain view, then a reasonable officer certainly should not have done so here.
2.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.