The following excerpt is from Bland v. California Dept. of Corrections, 20 F.3d 1469 (9th Cir. 1994):
We review the trial court's refusal to substitute counsel for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Walker, 915 F.2d 480, 482 (9th Cir.1990). The denial of a motion to substitute counsel implicates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, see id. at 485, and thus is properly considered in this habeas proceeding.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.