The following excerpt is from Robben v. City of Lake Tahoe, No. 2:16-cv-2696-WBS-EFB P (E.D. Cal. 2017):
A party seeking a stay must make out a clear case of hardship or inequity in being required to go forward. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1109 (9th Cir. 2005). This is not a clear case of hardship. The deadline for filing an amended complaint has already been
Page 2
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.