California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Horace, A150748 (Cal. App. 2019):
it be such as to render a different result probable on a retrial of the cause; 4. That the party could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced it at the trial; and 5. That these facts be shown by the best evidence of which the case admits.' . . . [] 'Applications on this ground are addressed to the discretion of the court below, and the action of the court below will not be disturbed except for an abuse of discretion. . . .' " [Citations.]' ' "[I]n determining whether there has been a proper exercise of discretion on such [a] motion, each case must be judged from its own factual background." ' " (People v. Cua (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 582, 608 (Cua).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.