California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, B230174 (Cal. App. 2012):
"In ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to section 1118.1, a trial court applies the same standard an appellate court applies in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, that is, ' "whether from the evidence, including all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, there is any substantial evidence of the existence of each element of the offense charged." [Citations.]' . . . 'Where the section 1118.1 motion is made at the close of the prosecution's case-in-chief, the sufficiency of the evidence is tested as it stood at that point.' [Citations.]" (People v. Cole (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1158, 1212-1213; see also People v. Belton (1979) 23 Cal.3d 516, 520-521.) "Whether defendant aided and abetted the crime is a question of fact, and on appeal all conflicts in the evidence and reasonable inferences must be resolved in favor of the
Page 25
judgment." (People v. Mitchell (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 325, 329.) We review independently a trial court's ruling under section 1118.1 that the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction. (Cole, at p. 1213.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.