What is the test for a motion for a new trial on nonstatutory grounds such as denial of a fair trial after being denied a trial by a jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Clark, C083506 (Cal. App. 2018):

Courts have also granted new trial motions on nonstatutory grounds such as denial of a fair trial after being deprived of an opportunity to present a defense. (People v. Davis (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 106, 109-110.) Defendant asserts both statutory and nonstatutory grounds for a new trial here.

" ' "The determination of a motion for new trial rests so completely within the [trial] court's discretion that its action will not be disturbed unless a manifest and unmistakable abuse of discretion clearly appears." ' " (People v. Delgado (1993) 5 Cal.4th 312, 328.) " ' "[I]n determining whether there has been a proper exercise of discretion on such motion, each case must be judged from its own factual background." ' " (Ibid.)

We conclude there is no basis for disturbing the trial court's denial of defendant's new trial motion.

Defendant first argues that the verdicts on counts one and two were contrary to the evidence. Not so.

Other Questions


What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be made on the ground of the denial of a motion to continue the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be appealed from the order denying defendant's motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the trial court on a motion for a new trial where a jury was not adversely affected by an audio recording that was secretly recorded during jury deliberations? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion to set a date for trial violate a defendant's right to a jury trial and due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for a new trial grounded on jury misconduct constitute prejudice? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.