What is the test for a jury to instruct on either voluntary or involuntary manslaughter in a felony-murder case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Roldan, 110 P.3d 289, 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 360, 35 Cal.4th 646 (Cal. 2005):

"The trial court must instruct on lesser offenses necessarily included in the charged offense if there is substantial evidence the defendant is guilty only of the lesser. [Citation.] On the other hand, if there is no proof, other than an unexplainable rejection of the prosecution's evidence, that the offense was less than that charged, such instructions shall not be given." (People v. Kraft (2000) 23 Cal.4th 978, 1063, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 5 P.3d 68.) Defendant contends he was entitled to an instruction on voluntary manslaughter because his intoxication "affect[ed] or reduc[ed] the intent to steal necessary for a robbery conviction, [which was] the underlying felony in the felony-murder theory." This same evidence of his alleged intoxication,

[27 Cal.Rptr.3d 417]

he claims, required the court to instruct the jury on involuntary manslaughter because it showed he was unconscious at the time of the crime. These claims are meritless. The evidence that, at the time of the murder and robbery, defendant was intoxicated was meager. There was absolutely no evidence he had, at the time of the crime, been so intoxicated that he was unable to form the basic mental intent to commit a robbery, or was rendered unconscious. (People v. Cunningham (2001) 25 Cal.4th 926, 1009, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 25 P.3d 519.) We conclude the trial court properly refused to instruct on either voluntary or involuntary manslaughter and did not violate defendant's constitutional rights thereby.

[27 Cal.Rptr.3d 417]

Other Questions


Can a jury in a personal injury case be found to have erred in instructing the jury on involuntary manslaughter through the commission of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a sua sponte duty to instruct on voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, and simple assault as lesser included offenses to murder? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses of murder and attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be charged with or convicted of involuntary manslaughter under section 192, subd. (b) of the involuntary manslaughter statute? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
What is voluntary manslaughter and what is the definition of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a jury has been instructed to use the same or similar language as the standard instructions in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's instruction on voluntary manslaughter sufficient to convict a defendant of manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
In a second degree murder case, in what circumstances would have been a manslaughter verdict if the jury had been given the same instructions on the subject of murder and manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.