California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nerio, B268107 (Cal. App. 2016):
"[A] trial court must instruct on an uncharged offense that is less serious than, and included in, a charged greater offense, . . . whenever there is substantial evidence raising a question as to whether all of the elements of the charged greater offense are present. [Citations.]" (People v. Huggins (2006) 38 Cal.4th 175, 215.) "[T]his does not mean that the trial court must instruct sua sponte on the panoply of all possible lesser included offenses. Rather, . . .'"such instructions are required whenever evidence that the defendant is guilty only of the lesser offense is 'substantial enough to merit consideration' by the jury. [Citations.] 'Substantial evidence' in this context is '"evidence from which a jury composed of reasonable [persons] could . . . conclude[ ]"'
Page 11
that the lesser offense, but not the greater, was committed."' [Citation.]" (Ibid.; see also People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 (Breverman).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.