The following excerpt is from Tobin v. Davis, Case No. 1:18-cv-01375-NONE-SAB (E.D. Cal. 2020):
A federal court may not grant habeas relief until a petitioner has exhausted available state remedies with respect to each claim. 28 U.S.C. 2254(b); Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 272
Page 3
(1971). The exhaustion doctrine rests on principles of comity and federalism. Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 515 (1982). Exhaustion serves to: (1) protect the state court's role in the enforcement of federal law; (2) prevent disruption of state court proceedings; and (3) reduce piecemeal litigation. Id. at 518-20.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.