California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Clancey, Ct.App. 6 H036501, S200158 (Cal. 2013):
Defendant relies also on In re Messerschmidt (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 514, which (in dicta) opined it would be fundamentally unfair to "allow[] a prisoner who has established himself as a productive member of society over a long period of time to have his good work destroyed by recommitment." (Id. at p. 516.) We need not decide whether that dicta is correct (see United States v. Sanders (6th Cir. 2006) 452 F.3d 572, 577, fn. 4, 582-583 [declining to recognize such a claim under due process]; Hawkins v. Freeman (4th Cir. 1999) 195 F.3d 732, 750 [same]), because defendant has not shown that he "over a prolonged period of time, [became] a respected, productive, law-abiding member of society."
Page 29
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.