What is the test for a criminal conviction challenged as lacking evidentiary support?

"'In reviewing a criminal conviction challenged as lacking evidentiary support, "'the court must review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment below to determine whether it discloses substantial evidencethat is, evidence which is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuesuch that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.]" [Citation.]' [Citations.] 'An appellate court must accept logical inferences that the jury might have drawn from the evidence even if the court would have concluded otherwise. [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Halvorsen, supra, 42 Cal.4th at p. 419.)