California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Uber Techs., Inc., A160701, A160706 (Cal. App. 2020):
In fashioning a remedy, a court should "strive for the least disruptive remedy adequate to its legitimate task" and tailor it to the harm at issue. (Butt, supra, 4 Cal.4th at pp. 695-696.) And an injunction against legitimate business activities "should go no further than is absolutely necessary to protect the lawful rights of the parties seeking such injunction." (People v. Mason (1981) 124 Cal.App.3d 348, 354.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.