What is the standard of review of claims of instructional error in a jury trial?

We independently review claims of instructional error. (People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 733.) "'In reviewing [a] purportedly erroneous instruction[ ], "we inquire 'whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury has applied the challenged instruction in a way' that violates the Constitution." [Citation.] In conducting this inquiry, we are mindful that "'a single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation, but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge.'" [Citations.]

Page 12

'Additionally, we must assume that jurors are intelligent persons and capable of understanding and correlating all jury instructions which are given.'" (People v. Richardson (2008) 43 Cal.4th 959, 1028.)