What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence?

The same standard of review applies in cases, such as this one, where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence. ( People v. Zamudio (2008) 43 Cal.4th 327, 357, 75 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 181 P.3d 105.) Circumstantial evidence is like a chain which link by link binds the defendant to a tenable finding of guilt. The strength of the links is for the trier of fact, but if there has been a conviction notwithstanding a missing link it is the duty of

[218 Cal.App.4th 1054]