What is the standard of review for overturning a child sexual assault conviction for insufficient evidence?

"In addressing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction, the reviewing court must examine the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidenceevidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid valuesuch that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." ( People v. Kraft (2000) 23 Cal.4th 978, 1053, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 5 P.3d 68.) Reversal of a conviction for insufficient evidence "is unwarranted unless it appears that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support [the conviction]. [Citation.]"

[172 Cal.Rptr.3d 557]

( People v. Bolin (1998) 18 Cal.4th 297, 331, 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 412, 956 P.2d 374.) The same standard of review applies to juvenile court proceedings. ( In re Ryan N . (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1371, 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 620.)