What is the standard of review for a protective order under the DVPA?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Woods v. Woods (In re Woods), F070804 (Cal. App. 2016):
The standard of review for the grant of a protective order under the DVPA is abuse of discretion. (In re Marriage of Nadkarni (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1495.) Such an abuse occurs only when the ruling exceeds the bounds of reason. (Eneaji v. Ubboe (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1457, 1463.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review applied to a protective order under the DVPA? (California, United States of America)
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for review of a grant or denial of a protective order under the DVPA? (California, United States of America)
In an appeal against a demurrer without leave to amend, what is the standard of review of the order sustaining the order? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award, what is the standard for reviewing an order from the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a trial court's order involving discovery matters or other matters? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to an order under the DVPA? (California, United States of America)
When a bench officer issued an order for a fee under review was not the same bench officer as the judge who presided over the trial, can the court exercise a less deferential standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a receiver to review an order issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
